Can Singapore’s AI start-ups build lasting businesses?

On construction sites, shipyards and dams in 15 countries, Ailytics uses artificial intelligence (AI) to analyse video from more than 1,400 cameras and flag safety hazards. The Singapore start-up says it had flagged 4.2 million hazards across 500 million square metres of workspace as of January, including at Changi Airport’s Terminal 5, a dam renovation in Japan and a bridge project in Australia.
While this is a less visible use of AI than a chatbot, it may say more about the commercial test facing Singapore’s AI start-ups.
Singapore drew 94% of Southeast Asia’s venture funding in the first half of 2026, according to Tracxn. Whether that money produces lasting companies will depend partly on AI start-ups’ ability to stay useful as model providers add features of their own.
This is why investors are increasingly looking beyond pitch decks and demonstrations for proof that an AI start-up has solved a customer’s problem more than once. Some are even asking to speak directly with customers, Darren Mowry, vice president of global start-ups and investor ecosystems at Google Cloud, tells DigitalEdge.
Jeremy Tan, co-founder and managing partner of Tin Men Capital, applies a further test, asking whether a product is important enough for a customer to pay to fix the problem it addresses. His Singapore-based venture firm backs B2B and frontier technology companies across Southeast Asia, including Ailytics.
“AI start-ups that focus on a lucrative pain point — medicine, not vitamin — by going deep into one vertical have a much higher chance of convincing customers to adopt beyond a pilot,” says Tan. By medicine, he means a product that solves an urgent and costly problem. A vitamin may help, but the customer can get by without it.
An AI model, adds Tan, is only one part of the sale. Customers must also be able to use the AI solution without disrupting their business or exposing sensitive data. “Delivering value for an enterprise involves much more than an AI model. Workflow, data security, repeatability, explainability and reliability all determine whether a deployment succeeds.”
The vertical bet
Tan points to Groundup.ai and Pints AI, both in Tin Men Capital’s portfolio, to illustrate his focus on companies that go deep into a specific industry.
Groundup.ai uses AI to monitor industrial equipment. It has signed US$45 million ($57.14 million) in operational contracts over the past 18 months after raising US$6.7 million over its lifetime. Its largest contract, worth more than US$30 million over several years, was a repeat order from an existing customer. As for Pints AI, it has helped 12 regulated financial institutions in four countries generate a combined US$10 million in savings in under two years, adds Tan.
The legal and insurance industries are also attracting AI start-ups. Mowry cites Harvey, which applies AI to legal work that was previously manual. Meanwhile, in insurance, AI start-ups are helping underwriters assess risk and prepare quotes faster. “There are agentic AI start-ups going into that space and reducing the amount of time it takes an underwriter to evaluate risk and generate premiums
and quotes [even though it is not a glamorous use of AI],” he says.
Beyond wrappers
Mowry contrasts those companies with the founders he met two years ago, many of whom were building what the industry calls wrappers, or thin software layers around a large language model. “The vast majority of my conversations [with AI start-ups] now are at the agentic AI layer. It will not be about wrappers anymore,” he adds.
Singapore camera-network start-up Lytehouse is among the AI companies Mowry has in mind when he talks about moving beyond wrappers. It uses existing CCTV systems to help retailers and industrial operators, including FairPrice Group, manage theft, queues and safety compliance. It is expanding into logistics, real estate and industrial sites overseas.
An AI start-up’s defence against a model provider, therefore, lies in proprietary data, industry and regulatory expertise, distribution, and the customer relationship built through implementation. “None of these are things that a model provider adds in a release,” says Tan, adding that Ailytics and Groundup.ai have access to data from live worksites and industrial equipment that cannot be found online or bought off the shelf.
Despite Southeast Asia’s many languages, Tan notes that language alone offers little advantage. “It is a hygiene factor and one we cannot do without, but it is not a differentiator. A company whose advantage rests mainly on a country’s language or regulations may build a strong local business but find it harder to expand beyond that market.”
Built to leave Singapore
When assessing a potential start-up investment, Tin Men Capital looks for founders who intend to expand beyond Singapore from day one and have begun laying the groundwork to do so. One sign is an AI product that addresses a problem that is “not hyper-local” and has a sizeable market beyond Southeast Asia, Tan says.
That ambition is common among founders of Singapore start-ups, says Mowry, who contrasts it with American founders. “The market in the US is big enough that if they just built a business for the US, they’re probably going to be okay. [But] when I meet founders here in Singapore, the reaction and the response is an immediate ‘go global’ [as they don’t have that option to the same extent].”
Another criterion is product-market fit, or evidence that a start-up is providing something that addresses a real market need. “Revenue is not a good indicator of this. Without getting into technicalities, we want to see that around 40% of customers would kick and scream if the product were pulled out of the market,” adds Tan.
Tin Men Capital also looks for “repeatable and defensible gross margins of about 80% for pure software and 70% for businesses that combine software with hardware”, says Tan. “Customers in Singapore have high bargaining power. If the gross margins work here, they should hold in other developed markets such as Australia and Japan.”
When growth is not enough
Not everything wearing an AI label clears that bar. Tan is wary of firms whose revenue comes mainly from helping enterprises implement AI but present that work as a scalable software product. “They are not vertical plays, the margins do not behave like software, and fast user growth in that model is not the same thing as demand for a product,” says Tan.
He continues: “The same caution applies to anything sitting horizontally across every industry without going deep into one. Going back to the earlier point — if the offering is a vitamin rather than a medicine, the pilot rarely becomes a purchase order.”
Mowry ran his own version of that filter when assessing start-ups. “It’s complexity, cost or economics, and then it’s scale.” On economics, he is less interested in the cost of AI tokens than in what it costs a customer to complete a task. “Tokenomics is yesterday’s world. In an agentic AI world, we need to be thinking about the cost of the task or the cost of the action,” he explains.
Singapore has become the region’s main destination for AI venture money. Whether it remains so will depend on its local startups turning AI into products customers pay for repeatedly, rather than projects that demand more staff with each sale.




